Download the PDF
version of this article if you wish to view it or print it out
with the same formatting as appears in the print version of the
Rocky Mountain Review.
(Requires Adobe Acobat
Reader.)
Richard Helgerson. A Sonnet from Carthage:
Garcilaso de la Vega and the New Poetry of Sixteenth-Century Europe.
Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007. 120p.
Heather C. Easterling
Gonzaga University
At a fruitful time in which questions of early modern literature and empire are
being revisited in light of new attention to literacy, to gender, and to the
period as one of great vernacular change, Richard Helgerson's new book extends
his ideas and expertise on language and nationhood in sixteenth-century England
to France and, especially, Spain. A Sonnet from Carthage: Garcilaso de la
Vega and the New Poetry of Sixteenth-Century Europe first and foremost is
a close reading of the title's noted 1535 sonnet by Garcilaso de la Vega,
who along with his friend and fellow-poet Juan Boscán (to whom the sonnet
is addressed), pioneered a "new poetry" in sixteenth-century Spain, reforming
Spanish verse via self-conscious imitation of Italian and ancient Roman forms.
But the extended essay that makes up this slim volume also and importantly uses
Garcilaso's sonnet as a synecdochic exemplar of the "new poetry" of the
sixteenth-century across Western Europe. As Helgerson describes, "In a single
14-line sonnet ... I found expressed the deepest ambitions, longings,
reservations ... and interdependencies that had shaped the new poetry wherever
it appeared" (x). This is an audacious proposition and also quintessential
Helgerson, whose acclaimed Forms of Nationhood (1992) brilliantly --
if at times reductively -- illuminated, interpreted, and linked the ambitions,
anxieties, and output of a generation of Elizabethan English men of letters.
In the present book, Helgerson aims to illuminate, interpret, and link his own
prior work on Sidney and Spenser, "new poets" of England, with France, Spain,
and to a lesser degree Italy. The result is a reading that dissects this
self-conscious, vernacular-reinventing poetry of empire and exposes contradictions
and conflicting sensibilities within it which Helgerson sees as inherent, even
essential, to the new genre.
The book is divided into two parts, Part I comprising Helgerson's essay in six
short chapters on the sonnet, and Part II a small but valuable collection of
other poems by Garcilaso presented by Helgerson and his assistant William Gahan
in English and Spanish. A precise attention to Garcilaso's poetry as part of his
trajectory within Spain's imperial project is revealed in Helgerson's departure
from conventional ordering of the poems in Part II. Instead they are presented
in the chronological order in which Garcilaso likely wrote them during his
participation in Spain's siege of Tunis. Along the way pointing out the
significant generic innovation of Garcilaso just in this small collection --
a classical epistle, two elegies, and a Latin ode -- Helgerson highlights
the poems as the most proximate literary companions of the sonnet that is
his primary focus and thus vividly frames Garcilaso's sonnet with the sense
of a self-conscious artistic and discursive project.
In Part I, an initial chapter, "What They Expected (... and What They Got),"
offers an opening survey of the phenomenon of the "new poetry" in Europe,
with the chapter's somewhat cumbersome title signaling the demands on a poet
of empire as well as the complex and even contradictory allegiances for
Garcilaso and his peers. This first chapter distills much of Helgerson's
(and others') prior work on epic and romance and on empire, nation, and
language; and the intellectual delight with which Helgerson links the ambitions
and challenges of Sidney and Spenser with their earlier French and Spanish
counterparts is palpable. Though at times masterfully precise in discussing
the nuanced tensions of a poetry of imperial glory that is also a love poetry
of erotic self-abandonment, at other times Helgerson moves too quickly,
making interpretive leaps and offering a kind of master-narrative -- with
no notes and few references -- that can feel too seamless. Acknowledging that
he is undertaking a risky "romp" through a lot of history and material,
Helgerson also dispenses with the issue of notes by suggesting their lesser
significance for his essay format. I disagree with him and his editors on
this point, frequently having found myself looking for or wishing for a
reference or citation. While not a fatal diminishment of the book, the
omission prevents a level of transparency and acknowledgement of scholarly
discourse that is somewhat surprising for someone of Helgerson's stature
and more typical largesse.
Having limned the new poetry as one of "profound self-division," including an
essential, paradoxical interdependence of imperial ambition and erotic, lyric
dilation, Helgerson devotes the rest of Part I to reading Garcilaso's sonnet
in five short chapters, each headed by a word or detail from the sonnet that
organizes its explication and that reveals, for Helgerson, several additional
commitments present in the new poetry more broadly. In "Aqui" (chapter 4),
Helgerson contemplates the significance of Garcilaso's assertion of place in
his sonnet, a "here" that is Carthage in the poem. In evoking Carthage,
Garcilaso of course evokes the most potently not-Rome, not-imperial of places,
and also asserts the importance of place in the face of the essential placelessness
of empire. Garcilaso's sonnet, Helgerson asserts, contributes to a duality that
both acknowledges empire's destruction of such places and suggests the seduction
and undermining attraction of these places as alternatives. Subsequent explicatory
chapters use "Me Deshago" ("I am undone") and "Boscán" similarly to tease
out rhetorical, ideological, and material commitments in Garcilaso's compact
sonnet that are both specific to Garcilaso and also, importantly for Helgerson's
project, present in the new poetry wherever it appeared.
A Sonnet from Carthage is a provocative and important book about the
innovations, modernity, and at times contradictory allegiances of sixteenth-century
poetry. The book's weaknesses -- the glaring absence of any notes, some overly
swift and seamless leaps and conclusions, a thin bibliography -- perhaps are indeed
inherent to its essay format. It is also possible that they were made inevitable
by the circumstances under which the book was written and sent to press. In his
Preface, Richard Helgerson reveals his diagnosis with terminal cancer in 2005,
just as he was sketching a much larger study with Garcilaso and his sonnet at
its center. With such a multi-year project suddenly, stunningly impossible, the
single chapter on Garcilaso's sonnet from Carthage that is the present book
becomes possibly the final chapter of a life's work, and the book truly functions
as an expert, brilliantly imaginative and insightful distillation of Helgerson's
longstanding interests and gifts as a reader of Renaissance literature and
culture. One perceives urgency in the task, and also moments of critical and
personal longview, where Helgerson seems anxious to identify and point out larger
patterns of civilization and of poetry's role in societal change that transcend
the early modern period. With this new book, Helgerson will leave us with both a
compelling new contribution to our understanding of sixteenth-century Europe's
and its poets' complex and conflicted ambitions, and a brilliant record of one
of our discipline's best minds at work.
|