Download the PDF
version of this article if you wish to view it or print it out
with the same formatting as appears in the print version of the
Rocky Mountain Review.
(Requires Adobe Acobat
Reader.)
Paul R. Petrie. Conscience and Purpose:
Fiction and Social Consciousness in Howells, Jewett, Chesnutt, and Cather.
Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2005. 232p.
Billy Merck
Washington State University
In Conscience and Purpose, Paul Petrie addresses William Dean Howells' theory on the
nature and role of literature in a time of a growth for both the American middle class and
the circulation of literature. Within this growth is a call to write from Howells that
contemplates how literature should engage its readers and society as a vehicle for social
understanding and change. From there, Petrie explores the presence and application of this
theory in the writings of American writers Howells, Charles W. Chesnutt, Sarah Orne Jewett,
and Willa Cather.
Petrie's first chapter, "W.D. Howells's Literary Antitheory: Toward a Social-Ethical Aesthetic
in the Editor's Study," revisits Howells' seminal theoretical work to lay the foundation
for the discussion of what the writers were working from. This chapter's ultimate success is
in the context it provides of the genesis of the theory driving and informing the literary
work discussed in the rest of the book. Petrie takes care to explore both Howells' theory
with regard to acceptance and detractors, and he explores the parameters of the scholarship
-- both its usefulness and shortcomings -- on the theory up to the current time. Petrie in
this section provides needed structure for the conversation in the following chapters to
take place. Though Petrie sometimes takes brief tangents, in this chapter and throughout
the book, that risk landing away from the topic, he brings them back around to support the
claim he is making and they ultimately work to inform the context fully.
With the understanding of what Howells called for and how it was received firmly in place,
Petrie moves his second chapter, "What Is To Be Done: Howells's Social-Ethical Fiction," in
the direction of exploring the application of this aesthetic in Howells' own fiction. Petrie's
most poignant context in this chapter shows that what Howells called for was not to be
achieved by one author or work alone. Rather, Petrie illustrates that though individual
works can function to address the Howellsian literary-cultural aesthetic, the success
of such ultimately rests on the discussion created from a collective of works functioning
in this manner, rendering it a multi-authored and fluid work in progress. Petrie ends the
chapter noting that no one author or work can achieve this -- as Howells' work shows --
which is exactly the reason Howells argued writers should embrace the task.
The next three chapters illustrate how Jewett, Chesnutt, and Cather each created works
in relationship to Howells' aesthetic. Throughout, Petrie is critical of these writers,
Howells, and critics of the subject in a manner that perpetuates the larger importance
of the obligations of both writer and scholar to engage in a dialogue outside of the art
-- a social one. Petrie illustrates that as writers worked with and from the Howellsian
aesthetic, attitudes toward its usefulness changed, and so did the applications. In the
final chapter, "Implications," Petrie explains how objectivity and honesty are the
clearest lenses through which to address this study, one that ideally should illustrate
the impact of Howells' aesthetic theory and the relationship of literary works that moved
out from that epicenter.
Petrie's handling of this subject is extremely appropriate in width and depth. Conscious and
Purpose provides the necessary context for a well-informed discussion to take place and
carries on that discussion relatively free of suffocating jargon or nebulous theory
interfering with the book's discussion and goals. Also, Petrie's care for the reader
is useful in allowing even the most novice scholar on the subject to navigate the
complexities of Howells' theory and its effects. Throughout, Petrie follows a consistent
presentation of argument, evidence, and transition, and his examples and notes are
appropriately informative. The depth and sophistication of the argument -- not to mention
the overall crux of the study to revisit Howells' effects on literature with a clean and
honest lens -- rewards the serious scholar of American literature and, more broadly, American
studies as a whole.
|