Download the PDF
version of this article if you wish to view it or print it out
with the same formatting as appears in the print version of the
Rocky Mountain Review.
(Requires Adobe Acobat
Reader.)
Lisa Surridge. Bleak Houses: Marital Violence in Victorian Fiction.
Athens: Ohio University Press, 2005. 271p.
Sarah Amyes Hanselman
Simmons College
In 1828 the Offenses Against the Person Act allowed cases of domestic abuse to be heard in
Magistrates Courts, as opposed to being tried by a jury. The subsequent newspaper coverage
of these trials began to reveal the cracks in domestic ideology, a fissure that was further
widened over the following years by such legislation as the Matrimonial Causes Acts of
1857 and 1878, and the Married Women's Property Acts of 1870 and 1882. The debates
preceding each Act and the trials resulting from them were fodder for court reporters,
social critics, and commentators. The volume and nature of such suits challenged the
underpinnings of Victorian gender conventions by calling into question the linkage of
the domestic with the private, and such concepts as "protective manliness," in addition
to revealing the tension between patriarchal authority and companionate marriage.
This period -- from 1828 to 1904 -- and these issues are the background for Bleak Houses:
Marital Violence in Victorian Fiction, Lisa Surridge's study of Victorian fiction and
domestic violence. In this volume, Surridge engagingly argues that such domestic issues as
coverture, domestic abuse, and divorce inform the novels and short stories of Charles
Dickens, Anne Brontë, George Eliot, Wilkie Collins, Anthony Trollope, Mona Caird,
and Arthur Conan Doyle. Proceeding chronologically through the century, Bleak Houses
explores the ways in which various legal or social issues are addressed in the fiction of
these writers.
The cornerstone of Surridge's argument is that the intense scrutiny of court and
legislative proceedings and debates in newspapers and perioidicals made flagrantly
public what had previously been considered strictly private family matters, and that
responses to this exposure become a central theme of Victorian fiction. Her study is
extensively researched and informed by newspaper articles, court reports, magazine
articles, and Parliamentary debates. With these texts as her ground, Surridge shows how
shifting cultural opinion about women's and men's roles in the family made its way into
fiction.
Surridge uses each chapter to focus on a particular aspect of public opinion and the law,
beginning with her examination of Dickens' response to the 1828 Offenses Against the Person
Act. Here Surridge introduces one of the themes that will recur throughout her work, which
is the law's increasing reach into the privacy of the middle-class home. Evaluating Dickens'
work in this period, Surridge notes that his "subjects may be working-class battered women,
but his texts are thus laced with the growing middle-class concerns over the impact of
public intrusion on the private home" (18). In subsequent chapters she examines the
question of domestic violence and middle-class manliness in Dombey and Son; The
Tenant of Wildfell Hall's criticism of "marital coverture as an underlying cause of
domestic assault and abuse" (73); and the roles of community and redemption in Eliot's
short story "Janet's Repentance" and Collins' The Woman in White. Her exploration
of He Knew He Was Right examines the tension between patriarchal authority and
companionate marriage, and assesses the ways in which that novel "shows the newspaper
as having a central role in the construction of 'private' consciousness" (186). Finally
Surridge examines the "ideological upheaval" of the fin de siècle in Mona
Caird's feminist novel The Wing of Azrael and the late Sherlock Holmes stories.
Throughout the study Surridge keeps her lens focused on the questions each work raises about
Victorian domesticity, marital abuse, and how these issues resonated in the public forum. Her
style is cogent and engaging, and the text is illustrated with cartoons and drawings from
periodicals and the novels themselves. Using trial transcripts and excerpts from
Parliamentary debates, Surridge traces the manifestations of the cultural conversation
in the novels, illuminating how the shift in public perceptions reveals itself in these
fictive works. While none of Surridge's conclusions are uniquely startling, her understanding
of these particular texts as responses to Victorian concerns sheds light on that age's
shifting attitudes about gender and the family and illuminates the interconnectedness of
fiction and the world that inspires it.
|