Download the PDF
version of this article if you wish to view it or print it out
with the same formatting as appears in the print version of the
Rocky Mountain Review.
(Requires Adobe Acobat
Reader.)
Tim Engles and John N. Duvall, eds.
Approaches to Teaching DeLillo's White Noise.
NY: Modern Language Association of America, 2006. 235p.
H. Louise Davis
Michigan State University
For those teaching Don DeLillo's White Noise for the first time, or even for those
seasoned DeLillo scholars hoping to develop new and innovative approaches to teach the
novel, this book in the MLA's Approaches to Teaching series will prove to be an
invaluable resource. The text, edited by Tim Engles and John N. Duvall, is an anthology
of 18 articles that explores various ways to theorize, deconstruct, and culturally
locate one of DeLillo's most provocative and best-selling novels. Separated into
five parts, Approaches is a text that consistently builds upon itself, each
section both reliant upon and adding to the previous. For instance, suggested assignment
materials and discussion questions posed in "Teaching White Noise in the Context
of Electronic Media and Technology" are informed by previous theoretical discussions
of DeLillo's text presented in "Cultural and Theoretical Approaches." Similarly,
the practical strategies described in the last section "Classroom Techniques and
Strategies" are extremely effective because they are supported by textual readings
and cultural contextualization of the novel provided in earlier sections of Engles
and Duvall's text. Engles and Duvall thus must be commended for the organization of
the articles included in this anthology.
Despite the strength of the collection as a whole, however, some of the individual essays
veer away from the anthology's primary aim; numerous contributors seem to forget to discuss
approaches to teaching the novel, assuming that their innovative approach toward or
reading of White Noise speaks for itself. The most glaring examples of this are
found in the section titled "Surveying White Noise." For instance, while extrapolating
the text in innovative ways, contributors Michael Bérubé and Margaret Soltan
seem reticent either to consider or to expand upon the needs of their students,
positioning their own readings of the text before their students' understanding.
And while Bérubé's approach might interest students knowledgeable about
sport, one can help but wonder how much he must alienate those students who know very
little about athletics or baseball. Similarly, Soltan's approach, so deeply imbedded in
the need to revive religion in the classroom, also leaves a lot to be desired;
non-religious students must find it hard to cope with her proselytizing. Both
Bérubé and Soltan would do well to borrow both strategies and approaches
from Louisa McKenzie. In her article "An Ecocriticical Approach to Teaching White
Noise," an article which is by far one of the most engaging of the anthology, McKenzie
not only demonstrates an awareness of her students needs and assumptions, but demonstrates
a pedagogical and theoretical self-reflexivity that Bérubé and Soltan lack.
McKenzie's argument focuses upon student understanding, rather than simply providing
new analytical readings of White Noise. Like many contributors, she asks students
to read White Noise through the lens of cultural and literary theory; however,
McKenzie's also explains how to help students to deconstruct and critique cultural and
literary theory (specifically ecocriticism) using insights gleaned from White Noise.
Unlike Bérubé and Soltan, teachers that obviously enter the classroom
with fixed readings of the text already in mind, McKenzie bases many of her classroom
activities upon students' reading of White Noise. The success of this student-centered
approach is clearly illustrated when she describes how, for her students, "White
Noise offers so many recognizable elements from the students' experiential world
that they find themselves making connections and 'doing literary criticism' with
relative ease" (62).
McKenzie is not alone in her self-reflexive, student-centered approach. Contributors
Tim Engles, Timothy Melley, Kathleen LeBesco, and Mark Osteen also discuss their
pedagogical philosophies and expectations of students. Osteen's article is particularly
insightful as it explores practical ways to interest and empower students. McKenzie
excels, however, because of her ability to provide extremely helpful teaching strategies
while providing a theoretical framework that does not advocate the teaching of the novel
"as an instance of 'applied' Baudrillard or Jameson" (as John N. Duvall paraphrases Cornel
Bonca) (125).
The tendency to focus intently upon White Noise as either an indictment of late
20th-century capitalism, or as representative of post-Pynchon postmodernism, may account
for the refusal of many of Approaches' contributors to consider gender issues in
DeLillo's work. After reading many of the approaches in Approaches one is left
wondering whether or not the women in White Noise are as irrelevant as they fear
they might be. Are women not affected by capitalism? Are women not consumers? Or
are the women's and girl's experiences simply insignificant to Marxist, postmodernist
discussions of DeLillo's work. Considering how women figure in Jack Gladney's
(White Noise's protagonist's) life, how Babette (Gladney's wife) disintegrates
as a result of her interactions with and the pressures of the hyperreal culture in which
she is immersed, it is amazing how so many discussions of DeLillo's capitalist, cultural,
and consumerist critique and completely elide gender at the same time.
Philip Nel, author of "Homicidal Men and Full-Figured Women: Gender in White Noise,"
is the only contributor to Approaches who even attempts a reading of male and
female roles in the novel. Surely he is not the only feminist teaching or writing about
the teaching of DeLillo's novel! Slipped in toward the end, Nel's essay functions as a
token nod to those teachers concerned with gender, to those feminists that may take
issue with the male-centered nature of Approaches. Nel's piece is both provocative
and informative, but it cannot make up for glaring omissions within the anthology.
Approaches to Teaching DeLillo's White Noise is certainly worth reading before
teaching DeLillo's work; but if one wants examples of teaching strategies that allow
for discussions and activities that address DeLillo and gender, one might have to
supplement Engles' and Duvall's text with other pedagogical and theoretical readings.
|