Download the PDF
version of this article if you wish to view it or print it out
with the same formatting as appears in the print version of the
Rocky Mountain Review.
(Requires Adobe Acobat
Reader.)
James E. Miller, Jr. T.S. Eliot: The Making of an American Poet, 1888-1922.
University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2005. 468p.
Sura P. Rath
Central Washington University
Since Eliot's death in 1965, several new biographical works have come out revealing his
life and adding to the interpretation of his works: Robert Sencourt's T.S. Eliot:
A Memoir appeared in 1971 and T.S. Matthews' Great Tom: Notes Towards the
Definition of T.S. Eliot in 1974, though neither had the benefit of access to
the poet's personal papers and unpublished letters. These were followed by Lyndall
Gordon's Eliot's Early Years (1977) and Eliot's New Life (1988), and
Peter Ackroyd's T.S. Eliot (1984), all incorporating information from the poet's
papers. In 1988 Valerie Eliot brought out The Letters of T.S. Eliot, Volume 1,
1898-1922; the second volume, expected the following year, has yet to appear.
Gordon's two volumes, revised, appeared in a single volume, T.S. Eliot: An
Imperfect Life (1998). Carole Seymour-Jones brought out her biography of Eliot's
first wife, Painted Shadow: A Life of Vivienne Eliot (2001).
James E. Miller, Jr.'s T.S. Eliot: The Making of an American Poet, 1888-1922 is a
biography of the poet's early life, focusing on his formative years in St. Louis,
Boston (especially his Harvard days), Paris, and London. Miller begins by quoting Eliot's
comment on his own poetry: "I'd say that my poetry has obviously more in common with my
distinguished contemporaries in America than with anything written in my generation in
England. That I'm sure of.... In its sources, in its emotional springs it comes from
America." On the surface, then, the biography serves as a vindication of scholars who
claim Eliot as an "American" poet; however, more important, it is both a continuation
and an elaboration of Miller's homosexual interpretation of The Waste Land in
T.S. Eliot's Personal Waste Land: Exorcism of the Demons (1977).
Miller counters the common critical view -- based largely on Eliot's "impersonal theory" of
poetry as an "escape from personality," not an expression of it -- that poems such as the
"Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock" and The Waste Land should be read in separation
from the poet's life. He draws on what he calls Eliot's "most intriguing statement about
The Waste Land" from a 1951 lecture "Virgil and the Christian World":
A poet may believe that he is expressing only his private experience; his lines may be
for him only a means of talking about himself without giving himself away; yet for his
readers what he has written may come to be the expression both of their own secret
feelings and of the exultation or despair of a generation. (xii)
His follow-up questions suggest his goal as a biographer is to deconstruct Eliot's remark,
to probe the "skull beneath the skin" and establish the missing links between the poet who
created and the man who suffered. The result of this psychoanalytical search of the youth
Eliot is the discovery of a sustained stream of homosexual affinities. Miller continues
the saga of John Peter's homoerotic reading of Phlebas the Phoenician as a character modeled
after Jean Verdenal in "A New Interpretation of The Waste Land" published in Essays
in Criticism in 1952, Eliot's objections and his lawyers' threats to the journal,
subsequent withdrawal of the journal issue from the market, and later reappearance
(1969) of the article.
Miller illustrates, sometimes with explicit statements from Eliot and his circle of friends
as well as with speculative cross-references and allusions, connections between the poetry
and the biographical details of the poet's personal experiences, his relationship with family
and friends, his marriage and sexuality, his intellectual and social development, and his
influences. The common image of Eliot among his readers has evolved from the public
impression of him as a student in prim and proper attire at Harvard. Bertrand Russell,
a visiting professor there, wrote of Eliot in 1914 to Lady Ottoline Morrell: "very
well dressed and polished with manners of the finest European type ... ultracivilized,
knows his classics very well, is familiar with all the French literature from Villon
to Vildrach, and is altogether impeccable in his taste but has no vigour of life --
or enthusiasm." However, Miller traces Eliot's lack of "vigour" to early indications
such as his adoration for D.H. Lawrence, especially of Fantasia of the Unconscious,
his shyness and "inversion," and the "painfully mixed memories of his experience with
his own mother."
Miller holds that Eliot "surely saw one side of him delineated by Lawrence in describing the
introvert's intense curiosity in 'mild perversions,' his 'lust for dirty stories.'" The
poet's own private side reflects this perversion and lust, according to Miller, in his
private correspondence with Conrad Aiken and Ezra Pound. In 1988, writing about Pound's
friendship with T.S. Eliot in A Serious Character: The Life of Ezra Pound, Humphrey
Carpenter quotes from a Wyndham Lewis letter dated January 1915: "Eliot has sent me 'Bullshit'
& the ballad for Big Louise. They are excellent bits of scholarly ribaldry. I am longing to
print them in Blast; but stick to my naïve determination to have no 'Words
Ending in -Uck, -Unt, and -Ugger.'" Eliot understood and accepted Blast's editorial
policy and wrote to Pound, "I fear that King Bolo and His Big Black Kween will never burst
into print. I understand that Priapism, Narcissism, etc., are not approved of."
The book is organized in fourteen chapters, each covering two to three years. Whether one
agrees with the legitimacy and literary value of what Eve Kosofsky calls "the epistemology
of the closet," Miller makes a persuasive argument for his homosexual reading of Eliot
with support from archival material taken from Gordon, Ackroyd, and Seymour-Jones. Obviously,
The Making of an American Poet will contribute to some revisionist readings of Eliot
and provoke scholars to approach the poet in new ways.
|