Download the PDF
version of this article if you wish to view it or print it out
with the same formatting as appears in the print version of the
Rocky Mountain Review.
(Requires Adobe Acobat
Reader.)
Peter Erickson and Maurice Hunt, eds.
Approaches to Teaching Shakespeare's Othello.
New York: MLA, 2005. 244p.
Joanne Craig
Bishop's University
This volume brings together twenty short essays about teaching Othello. They range in
scope from traditional academic considerations of the play to recipes that outline strategies,
list questions for discussion in the classroom, or both. Understandably, color dominates these
discussions. Samuel Crowl points out in his essay "'Ocular Proof': Teaching Othello in
Performance" that "Othello -- particularly since our age has rightly made problematic
the casting of a white actor in blackface for the title role -- is no longer a staple of
the Shakespearean repertory" (162), while Miranda Johnson-Haddad warns in "Teaching
Othello through Performance Choices" that "to approach this play gingerly may empower
its racist elements in the wrong ways" (160). On the one hand, color is the most compelling
and troubling issue in the play; on the other, it is the most demanding because of the
need to historicize it.
Gender takes second place, and it's interesting to see how the contributors distribute emphasis
between the two kinds of difference. For instance, Kathy M. Howlett's concerns about the ways
in which films of the play repress gender are central in her "Interpreting the Tragic Loading
of the Bed in Cinematic Adaptations of Othello." The ubiquitous term race itself is
contentious. I share the reservations that Nicholas F. Radel expresses in "'Your Own for
Ever': Revealing Masculine Desire in Othello." He writes: "In deference to house style,
I have omitted quotation marks around race and its derivatives.... It is important not to
reconstruct race as an essential category while working to deconstruct sexuality" (71).
A long section by the editors, "Materials," precedes the essays, which appear as "Approaches."
"Materials" in turn is divided into sections about editions and other teaching resources, each
with its own subdivisions. The first subdivision, on complete editions, reports that according
to the editors' survey the Norton Shakespeare is by far the favorite among collections of
the plays, while E. A. J. Honigmann's edition in the Arden 3 series prevails among the separate
texts. In my own survey, based on the contributors' lists of works cited, Riverside and Arden
3 dominate. The editors also survey recent work on the text and its sources and critical books
and essays of interest to teachers and students, with a particular focus on gender and color;
influence, appropriation, and comparison; and performances and films of the play. A tribute to
Jim Andreas, the original editor, who died while the book was being planned, completes the
extensive introductory material.
"Approaches" is organized under the headings "Histories of Race," "Genealogies of Gender and
Sexuality," "Generic Frameworks," "Classroom Strategies," "Approaches to Performance," and
"Comparative Contexts." Obviously many of these categories overlap. Michael Neill in his
essay "Othello and Race" comes directly to terms with the obsessively and irrationally
fascinating subject of a black man and a white woman. After exploring the history of the
play in performance and criticism, Neill traces both its condemnation as racist and praise
as an antidote to racism in the 20th century to its incorporation of the "range of
competing ideas about color" (51) in Shakespeare's time. He carefully differentiates
thinking on race in the 17th century from that of our own time, and then backtracks by
pointing out the emergence of consistencies from the unstable mix. In Shakespeare's
theater Othello was a white actor in blackface, but over time the possibilities have
come to include white Othellos, black Othellos, white Othellos in an otherwise black
cast, and color-blind casting.
In "Improvisation and Othello: The Play of Race and Gender," Emily C. Bartels fastens on
the pivotal dialogue, vulnerable to cuts, in which Desdemona chides Othello about her intention
to make sure that he is aware of her point of view as a kind of statement of policy for their
new marriage (III.iii.41-92). Bartels suggests that we make the students, whose contact with
the play is likely to be the fixed printed text of a classic, aware of the spontaneity and
flexibility of the theater, with its capacity for improvisation and surprise, by emphasizing
Othello's status as husband in the relatively open context of marriage, as opposed to his
relatively fixed public status as the Moor of Venice. The scene, Bartels says, is "a
malleable crux of character and meaning" (76). To learn how it works, she recommends
that students take the performance of the dialogue through a series of modulations and
variations, for instance playing it first with a dominating Othello and a submissive
Desdemona, then with a submissive Othello and dominating Desdemona, to contextualize
the discussion of Cassio and his problems that takes place in it.
Virginia Mason Vaughan in "Teaching Richard Burbage's Othello" recommends consideration of
Burbage's Othello as a way of encouraging students to see how concepts like that of color
are historical and vary over time. The fluidity in the representation of Othello also reflects
the terminology in the play, which fluctuates between references to its hero as black and as
a Moor, and the ways in which Shakespeare's contemporaries linked race with geographic,
religious, economic, and cultural differences. Vaughan writes that "Shakespeare's Othello
was not the essential black hero but the product of a white imagination represented by
English actors to a white audience" (149). That imagination sees the black man as jealous,
passionate, easily out of control. Consideration of the racism of the past can help
students to recognize "racist elements of their own culture that are much less
transparent" (154).
In the section on comparative contexts, Lisa Gim's essay "Teaching Othello with Works
by Elizabeth Cary and Aphra Behn" has a very strong practical orientation in its array of
bibliographical references and questions for discussion and for students' research on
Mariam, Oroonoko, and Othello. Sheila T. Cavanagh suggests teaching
Othello with Cinthio's story, Verdi's opera, and Paula Vogel's Desdemona: A Play
about a Handkerchief to show students uncertainties and ambiguities in Shakespeare's
text that the other three writers exploit. Janelle Jenstad uses Izak Dinesen's story
"The Blank Page" to develop a subtle argument that links the handkerchief, the wedding
sheets, and Desdemona's body in "Paper, Linen, Sheets: Dinesen's 'The Blank Page' and
Desdemona's Handkerchief." Finally Joyce Green MacDonald's "Finding Othello's African
Roots through Djanet Sears's Harlem Duet" works with an adaptation by a black
feminist in which the emphasis falls on Othello's abandonment of black women for a
white one.
Approaches to Teaching Shakespeare's Othello should encourage teachers to confront the
challenges the play offers. Like the others in its series, the book provides a useful overview
of its subject and abundant bibliographic resources. It will probably contribute more to
effective teaching in offering a multitude of attitudes and ideas than in its specific
proposals of techniques, exercises, and other activities.
|