Download the PDF
version of this article if you wish to view it or print it out
with the same formatting as appears in the print version of the
Rocky Mountain Review.
(Requires Adobe Acobat
Reader.)
Matthias Becher. Charlemagne.
Trans. David S. Bachrach.
New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003. 154p.
Jolyon Timothy Hughes
Colorado State University
Translated now from the 1999 original, Karl der Grosse, published in München,
Matthias Becher, professor of medieval history at the University of Bonn, presents his
readers with a solid overview of the reign of Charlemagne (768-814). He delves into the
situations that allowed Charlemagne's ancestors, who had the title of Mayor of the Palace,
to assume power over the Frankish empire from the Merovingian line. Becher then
describes the events that unfolded to make Charlemagne the undisputed ruler of
Western Europe and the only real threat to Byzantium in the east and the Muslim
empire to the southwest.
While Charlemagne is a very readable
text, its only serious flaw is that it is littered with typographical and other
orthographic errors. Despite the editorial miscues, the text serves as a solid
introduction to one of the most important historical figures for any European
country. Becher ably describes the life of Charlemagne, his family (his
immediate family such as his brother and his sons as well as his wives and
concubines) and his political acumen. Another emphasis of Becher's work is to
discuss Charlemagne's relationship with the Church and how this relationship is
often misunderstood through the legend that has grown around the figure of
"Karl der Grosse."
Central to the Carolingian Renaissance was Charlemagne's ability to govern an area
that Becher successfully argues had reached its limits of expansion. Charlemagne
undertook efforts to create centers of learning, reform weights and
measurements, and create new courts with juries based on revised and codified
Frankish law. These accomplishments are essential for a ruler trying to
establish himself not only as "patricius Romanorum," but
as "pacificus imperator, Romanum gubernans imperium."
His importance, according to Becher, extends far
beyond his dynastic conquests of the various Germanic tribes. In taming the
fragmented Saxons (with their various leaders and numerous peoples), as well as
the Lombards, Eastphalians, Westphalians, Bavarians, and Avars, Charlemagne not
only conquered lands and peoples, but spread Christianity to these areas. There
was more to Charlemagne's conquest of these peoples than the legend would
indicate. According to Becher, Christianity, with its hierarchical structures,
provided Charlemagne with the opportunity to assign Bishoprics to the newly
conquered areas. These Bishoprics in turn had far-reaching impact on patterns
of settlement and provided central locations in which impressive stone
structures, such as churches and cathedrals, showed Charlemagne's power and
resolve.
Becher's most intriguing points of contention are with Charlemagne's official biographer
Einhard, who wrote his Vita Karoli Magni about ten years after the great ruler's death.
Becher takes issue with Einhard on a great many issues, but gives him fair representation and
treatment allowing the reader to be informed of what was said, how it was said, and what
that meant to an author in Einhard's time. But Becher establishes that Einhard
exaggerated and was inclined to make Charlemagne, his close friend, seem more
magnificent than he probably was.
The book ends as it begins, with succession issues to be resolved among
Charlemagne's heirs. The similarities to the situation of Charlemagne's own
succession in relation to his older brother Carloman are shown as a continual
dynastic struggle that would continue to shape the face of Europe for centuries
to come. There are a few tables or charts (2) that show the Merovingian and
Carolingian dynasties up to the year 845, but charts depicting the succession
of Charles the Great are conspicuously missing.
Charlemagne at 154 pages of text, 170 if all indices are
included, is easily accessible and is written well enough to hold the reader's
interest. Becher is careful not to get bogged down in minutiae and is able to
show Charlemagne as a human ruler with faults, but also with an ability to rise
above them. The organizational style of the book also lends itself well to
accessibility of information, making this text an excellent reference tool.
|