Download the PDF
version of this article if you wish to view it or print it out
with the same formatting as appears in the print version of the
Rocky Mountain Review.
(Requires Adobe Acobat
Reader.)
Violent Housekeepers: Rewriting Domesticity
in Riders of the Purple Sage
Cathryn Halverson
Kobe City University of Foreign Studies
What role does the domestic purview -- creating and maintaining a
home -- play in westerns? Why do westerns include so many male
housekeepers? To begin thinking about these questions, let us
consider Jane Tompkins' claim in West of Everything: The Inner
Life of Westerns (1992), that formula westerns arose to challenge
the dominance of female-authored domestic fiction:
The Western answers the domestic novel. It is the antithesis of the
cult of domesticity that dominated American Victorian culture.... If
the Western deliberately rejects evangelical Protestantism and
pointedly repudiates the cult of domesticity, it is because it
seeks to marginalize and suppress the figure who stood for those
ideals. (39)
Tompkins argues that, in particular, Zane Grey's Riders of the
Purple Sage (1912) "openly dramatizes ... the destruction of
female authority." She perceives the struggles between the
characters of Lassiter and Jane as emblematic of the novel's
conflict between the masculine world of violence and the feminine
world of Christianity and domesticity, and maintains that Lassiter's
world triumphs when Jane is convinced of the need to kill (40).
Along with Annette Kolodny's The Land Before Her (1984) and
Patricia Limerick Nelson's Legacy of Conquest (1987), West
of Everything is one of the few studies of western texts and
discourse known to a general audience of Americanists. In the field
of western literature itself, the book has made Tompkins remarkably
notable. She is linked with Lee Mitchell and Richard Slotkin as an
important theorist of western culture and popular westerns
(Campbell 12; Cawelti 886). Krista Comer, in limning a history of
feminist western criticism, begins with Kolodny, continues with
Melody Graulich, and ends "finally" with Tompkins (22). Her text's
renown derives both from Tompkins' own reputation and the exciting
connections she makes between formula westerns and sentimental
novels.
The prominence of West of Everything makes it important,
therefore, to point out that its central thesis is not wrong but
somewhat askew. Westerns do subordinate or erase women and they do
privilege violence. What they do not do, however, is "exclud[e]
everything domestic from [their] worldview" (132). On the contrary,
frequently they valorize domesticity: but in their case,
domesticity that has been appropriated from women and that is
linked with violence. Richard Slotkin uses Riders of the Purple
Sage to support his thesis that westerns, like so many American
texts, "represented the redemption of American spirit or fortune
as something to be achieved by playing through a scenario of
separation, temporary regression to a more primitive or 'natural'
state, and regeneration through violence" (12). Grey's novel does
indeed accord with Slotkin's argument. The regeneration through
violence that it portrays, however, occurs via domesticity. Such
a turn allows white men to skirt savagery while on the road to
becoming supermen.
Riders of the Purple Sage, as Slotkin's and Tompkins' use of
the text indicates, has an important place in western literary
studies. The text has long been central to both popular and critical
understandings of what the western is, and Mitchell maintains that
Grey "all but single-handedly confirmed the shape of a powerful
new narrative form" (Westerns 123). One of the best-selling
westerns ever, on first appearance Riders sold over a million
copies, by 1938 twenty-seven million, and by 1968 forty million
(Mitchell, "White Slaves" 235-36; Blaha 949). As testament to its
continuing name familiarity, a contemporary anthology reworks the
title into Writers of the Purple Sage. Its repute and
influence, aided by its more than usual complexity, make the
text loom large in most scholarly discussions of westerns. Such
distinction is self-sustaining, as critics seek to complement
or contest previous readings. Riders has become a kind of
convenient shorthand both to discuss Grey's oeuvre and, more
important, to discuss early aspects of the genre.
The book describes the attempts of Jane Withersteen, daughter of a
wealthy Mormon polygamist, to prevent the outlaw gunman Lassiter
from killing the Mormon church leaders he blames for his sister
Milly's kidnapping and death. These same Mormons are out to destroy
Jane's ranch due to her refusal to marry into the church and her
friendship with Bern Venters, a Gentile cowboy. In a subplot that
grows to dominate the text, Venters shoots the infamous Masked
Rider, accomplice to the rustling outlaw Oldring. The wounded man
turns out to be a young woman and, incidentally, Milly's long-lost
daughter and Lassiter's niece Bess. To provide a place for Bess to
convalesce, Venters labors to build a home for the two of them in
the narrow canyon of Surprise Valley. The canyon, accidentally
discovered by Venters, can be gained only through one steep passage
guarded by the massive, teetering "Balancing Rock." When Bess
regains her health, she and Venters make a run for Venters'
childhood home of Illinois. At the same time, Lassiter and Jane,
along with the orphan child Fay, flee towards Surprise Valley to
save themselves from the bloodthirsty Mormons close on their heels;
along the way the two couples meet and exchange steeds. Once
arrived, Jane urges Lassiter to "roll the rock!" The act both
destroys their pursuers and locks the pair "forever" in isolation
within the valley -- although (a point usually overlooked by
critics) Grey suggests that ten years hence Bess and Bern will
return with rope ladders to scale its walls and join the other
couple.
Riders of the Purple Sage spotlights male characters who,
rather than repudiating the domestic culture historically
associated with women, become increasingly active in the domestic
sphere and who appropriate control of the domestic from women
through demonstrating the necessary efficacy of violence. Instead
of resisting the power of women homemakers, the men themselves
become homemakers, albeit often homemakers out of doors. Venters
becomes a man by virtue of making a home for Bess in a place that
already has a long domestic history of cliff dwellers. After
transforming Jane's ranch into a "real home," Lassiter seals
himself, Jane, and Fay into Surprise Valley. There they will
resume the idyllic homesteading initiated by Venters. Ten years
in the future, when Bess and Venters succeed in returning to
Surprise Valley, all five erstwhile loners and outcasts will be
joined to form a tiny family headed by Lassiter, a.k.a. "Uncle
Jim": "I reckon I'm Milly's brother, an' your uncle! ... Uncle
Jim! Ain't that fine?" (306).
Michael Kimmel argues in Manhood in America: A Cultural
History that by the end of the nineteenth century, white
middle-class men were finding the experience of separate spheres
increasingly painful yet feared the emasculation that the home
seemed to threaten: "Men were excluded from domestic life, unable
to experience the love, nurture, and repose that the home
supposedly represented. How could a man return to the home without
feeling like a wimp?" (158-159). Bret Harte, writing in the
mid-1800s, offered a semi-acceptable way for men to make such a
return in his well-known stories of mining camp life. One strand
of American discourse set up an opposition between the subdued
nature of life in the city and the rigor of life on the frontier:
"Let one remain in a quiet city, playing the milksop ... leading
an unambitious namby-pamby life, ... while the other goes out on
the frontier, runs his chance in encounters with wild animals,
finds that to make his way he must take his life in his hands, and
assert his rights, if necessary with deadly weapons" (Kimmel
88).1 Harte, however, showed that frontier life could
include quiet, "namby-pamby" aspects without compromising virility.
Although Harte maintained his distance from his characters through
a treatment both sentimental and comic, the miners' rough lives and
manners make them indisputably "masculine" in stories such as "Luck
of Roaring Camp," which portrays the domesticating effect of an
orphaned infant, or "Tennessee's Pardner." As a character in the
former remarks, "There's a street up there in 'Roaring' that would
lay over any street in Red Dog. They've got vines and flowers round
their houses, and they wash themselves twice a day. But they're
mighty rough on strangers" (Luck of Roaring Camp 20).
Popular understanding of westerns does not include home-centered
narratives. On the other hand, scholars seem to find their domestic
bent too obvious to merit discussion. Arthur Kimball alludes to the
"sugary domesticity" of Grey's work only in passing (86), as does
Mitchell to that of Wister and Grey ("White Slaves" 245). Perhaps
because they appear so natural, no attention has been paid to the
male housekeepers with whom westerns are replete. What scene could
seem more "western" to us than that of the cowboy making his tidy
camp, cozily boiling coffee and frying bacon?
Ernest Thompson Seton, founder of the Boy Scouts of America,
defensively maintained that frontier men themselves viewed their
involvement in domestic affairs ironically: "the home life of those
frontier days was nearly ideal; and so sanely adjusted that it may
have valuable lessons for those who are wrestling with modern
problems of living.... Those who cooked and sewed did so in an
atmosphere of fun and frolic" (Kimmel 170). More deflating are
the mid-nineteenth-century lithographs portraying the home life of
same-sex mining couples, reproduced in Blake Allmendinger's Ten
Most Wanted: The New Western Literature (68-70), which
exaggerate Harte's portrayal of the comic aspects of male
homosocial domesticity (titled "A Sundays Amusements," "Occupation
for Rainy Days," A Daily Pleasure," "A Pleasant Surprise," and "The
Miners Lamentations"). Yet when frontier violence was attended not
by homosocial but heterosexual domesticity, it appears to have lost
all of its comic register, and thus lent itself to Grey's
earnestness.
In Riders of the Purple Sage, the turn from homosociality
to heterosexuality is figured by Venters' discovery that the "boy"
he cares for, Oldring's masked Rider, is really a girl. Such a turn
justifies men's increasing commitment to domestic affairs, and
their heterosexual housekeeping is much more highly developed than
that of the male "pardners" and their camps so often parodied or
romanticized. The confluence of masculine violence and masculine
domesticity that Riders represents offers men a highly satisfying
route to make Kimmel's return to the house. At the same time, even
while their violent acts sanction such a return, the connection
between these acts and the maintenance of a proper heterosexual
home renders violence itself eminently respectable, a necessary
component of Anglo-Saxon civilization.
Such a contrast is reflected in a dominant turn-of-the-century
conception of masculinity in which, as Gail Bederman argues,
"middle-class white men simultaneously construct[ed] powerful
manhood in terms of both 'civilized manliness' and 'primitive
masculinity'" (23). That the men in Grey's novel are drawn to
the home demonstrates their civilized instincts, whereas the
violence that accompanies this transition maintains their
masculinity. Moreover, this move to the home actually expands
the scope of male power. The home, just like the realm of public
affairs, is now a site ruled by men. The "femininity" of the home
itself, however, remains intact: the home continues to be a haven
of peace and safety and nurture. Even though violence triggers
housekeeping, and housekeeping engenders more violence, the spheres
remain separate from each other. Significantly, the text's
climactic act of violence, Lassiter's rolling of the stone, takes
effect in the valley below the canyon where the two couples will
live, thus preserving the sanctity of the domestic milieu.
In one of the earliest scenes in the novel, Jane gives a womanly
shudder over the sound of coyotes and the thought of Venters
sleeping among them. She says to him, "at night, sometimes, when I
lie awake, listening to the long mourn or breaking bark or wild
howl, I think of you asleep somewhere in the sage, and my heart
aches. Just think! Men like Lassiter and you have no home, no
comfort, no rest, no place to lay your weary heads" (23). In true
cowboy fashion, Venters responds, "Jane, you couldn't listen to
sweeter music, nor could I have a better bed" (23). However,
seemingly unaware of the contradictions between Venters' words
and his emotions, Grey goes on to reveal that for Venters the
outdoors does not make a home, and that he finds his homelessness
excruciating. Outside of a larger social and labor network,
solitude is intolerable: "As a rider guarding the herd he had never
thought of the night's wildness and loneliness; as an outcast,
now when the full silence set in and the deep darkness, and trains
of radiant stars shone cold and calm, he lay with an ache in his
heart. For a year he had lived as a black fox, driven from his
kind. He longed for the sound of a voice, the touch of a hand"
(44). Contrast this description of Venters with the description
of his horse immediately following: "What [Wrangle] wanted was to
be free of mules and burros and steers, to roll in dust-patches,
and then to run down the wide, open, windy sage-plains, and at night
browse and sleep in the cool wet grass of a spring-hole. Jerd knew
the sorrel when he said of him: 'Wait till he smells the sage!'"
(45).2 Although Wrangle loves to be alone on the plains
far from degraded society, Venters is miserable. Feeling as he
does, it is no wonder that early on he tells Lassiter, "I want to
get out of Utah. I've a mother living in Illinois. I want to go
home" (30).
Despite Venters' preoccupation with his mother's home back east,
in Riders of the Purple Sage and many of his other texts, Grey
does not set up his women characters as western outsiders, as the
"east" in relation to the "west" of their men. Contrary, perhaps,
to readerly expectation, Grey portrays Jane and Bess as deeply tied
to the land, whereas both Lassiter and Venters are in the West only
incidentally. Eight years of wandering have led Venters to Utah, and
he wants out. Lassiter, born in Missouri and still distinctive for
his Texan accent, has come to Utah only to take revenge. In
contrast, Jane is both personally and historically rooted in the
place, her family having lived there for generations. When urged
to go elsewhere, she exclaims, "I'll never leave Utah.... I'll
never leave these purple slopes I know so well" (272). Grey
identifies Jane with the landscape, stating that "She herself
was of the sage" (163) and resembled the "wild, austere" land
(19). Likewise, Bess, "sweeter'n the sage" (226), "fitted
harmoniously into that wonderful setting; she was like Surprise
Valley -- wild and beautiful" (164). Raised in Oldring's remote
canyon, Bess negotiates the land on horseback better than anyone
living and her wild rides have made her a local legend.3
She regrets leaving Utah at Venters' behest and looks forward only
to their return, exclaiming "Oh! Bern! ... But look! The sun is
setting on the sage -- the last time for us till we dare come
again to the Utah border. Ten years! Oh, Bern, look, so you will
never forget!" Whereas Grey compares women to the rampant native
sage that lends the book its title, he compares men to the stunted
trees that barely survive: "This country was hard on trees -- and
men" (96).
It is primarily through Venters that Grey demonstrates how hard the
country could be, in that its wildness appears to deny the men who
inhabit it all homely comforts. When we first meet Venters, he has
been living alone on the plains for over a year. Nevertheless, his
camp is still scarcely a camp, marked only by his saddle, pack,
sleeping dog, and discomfort. Despite the months spent sleeping
out, Venters has not taken such rudimentary steps as stockpiling
coffee or securing cookware, much less erecting any sort of shelter.
The necessity of keeping himself hidden does not account for this
lack of basic equipment: as a reflection of his inner misery, Venters
seems intent on keeping himself as uncomfortable as possible. The
housekeeping that he does do is perfunctory and joyless, described
by Grey in the very opposite of his usual purple prose: Venters, on
arising, "stretched his cramped body, and then, gathering together
bunches of dead sage sticks, he lighted a fire. Strips of dried beef
held to the blaze for a moment served him and the dogs. He drank
from a canteen. There was nothing else in his outfit; he had grown
used to a scant fare. Then he sat over the fire, palms outspread,
and waited" (27).
Once Venters takes on caring for Bess after wounding her, though,
homemaking becomes his chief pursuit and chief pleasure -- more
so, it seems, than Bess herself. Although his long-term goal to
return to Illinois remains unchanged, Venters' immediate energies
are directed not just towards nursing Bess but towards making a
comfortable place to live. All, ostensibly, is for her: "I intend
to work -- to make a home for you here" (195). His first act of
violence initiates his first act of homemaking, as immediately after
shooting Bess he builds her a "little shack" of spruce boughs (56),
already a remarkably more substantial camp than that which he had
devised for himself. The next morning, while hunting a rabbit for
Bess, Venters stumbles upon Surprise Valley. There his homemaking
begins in earnest. The caves in the cliffs "were clean, dry, roomy.
He cut spruce boughs and made a bed in the largest cave and laid
[sic] the girl there" (110). Grey pleasurably details Venters'
subsequent efforts: "he fitted up the little cave adjoining the
girls' room for his own comfort and use. His next work was to build
a fireplace of stones and to gather a store of wood. That done, he
spilled the contents of his saddle-bags upon the grass and took
stock. His outfit consisted of a small-handled axe, a hunting knife,
a large number of cartridges for rifle or revolver, a tin plate, a
cup, and a fork and spoon, a quantity of dried beef and dried
fruits, and small canvas bags containing tea, sugar, salt and
pepper" (113). The camp brings Venters "peculiar satisfaction":
"Upon returning to camp he set about getting his supper at ease,
around a fine fire, without hurry or fear of discovery.... He caught
himself often, as he kept busy round the camp-fire, stopping to
glance at the quiet form in the cave, and at the dogs stretched
cozily near him, and then out across the beautiful valley" (116).
Venters resolves, long after he has been shown that Surprise Valley
meets all their needs and instigated only by Bess' teasing remark
that she was tired of game, that "he must go to Cottonwoods; he must
bring supplies back to Surprise Valley; he must cultivate the soil
and raise corn and stock" (191). Throughout almost the length of
the text, Venters remains preoccupied with "improving Surprise
Valley as a place to live in" (134). At the novel's opening,
Venters had longed to return to his mother's home in the East. The
plan delayed, he focuses instead on making his own home in the West.
Bess, in marked contrast to Venters, seems to have no ideas about
or interest in home improvement. Grey nevertheless commandeers her
for his endorsement of domesticity by showing that she, too, savors
the pleasures of home far more than wilder joys. Venters'
undertaking repeats Bess' history: Venters is not the first violent
housekeeper to have cared for Bess. As Oldring's Masked Rider, Bess
did not enjoy "riding like the wind" since she "never had time to
stop for anything." Rather, what she preferred was being held in
Oldring's cabin as a virtual prisoner: "As long as I can remember
I've been locked up there at times, and those times were the only
happy ones I ever had. It's a big cabin high up on a cliff, and I
could look out. Then I had dogs and pets I had tamed, and books.
There was a spring inside, and food stored, and the men brought me
fresh meat. Once I was there one whole winter" (130). The seemingly
most "western" of frontier figures -- cattle rustlers and cowboys --
create and maintain Bess' domestic world, which governs her rather
than being governed by her. On first discovering Surprise Valley,
Venters had remarked, "I've gone Oldring one better" (101), referring
to Surprise Valley's even greater seclusion than Oldring's Deception
Valley. He also goes Oldring "one better" in his homemaking: Oldring
had provided Bess merely a cabin, whereas Venters strives for an
entire homestead.
Venters and Oldring are both preceded by a much older group of
canyon homemakers, the cliff-dwellers. By locating Venters' burst
of domestic bustle in Surprise Valley, Grey suggests that Venters'
new focus derives as much from his proximity to the cliff-dwellers
as from caring for Bess. Indeed, their deserted homes provide the
actual "pots and crocks" that Venters steals to stock his new
kitchen (129). Despite the novel's explicit depiction of Indians as
an emblem of loneliness and isolation -- Grey describes Venters,
prior to meeting Bess, as "skulk[ing] about Jane's home, gripping
a gun stealthily as an Indian, a man without place or people or
purpose" (26) -- the erstwhile community of cliff-dwellers
represents the opposite of Venters' loneliness on the sage. In the
text real Indians, or at the least long since vanished Indians,
compose a community where people live closely vertically rather
than horizontally, keeping their population dense by expanding up
instead of out into the valley below and plains beyond.4
The cliff dwellers' carefully stocked and defended homes make
Venters realize that life is about relationships, just as do his
own forays into homebuilding: "We can't be any higher in the
things for which life is lived at all.... relationship [sic],
friendship -- love" (191). With these words, Venters mouths a
central tenet of nineteenth-century domestic ideology.5
The novel's depiction of women struggling to reform their men is
also a theme familiar from domestic novels. Discussing her attempt
to divest him of his guns, Jane explains to Lassiter, "I wanted you
to care for me so that I could influence you" (155). Tompkins
perceives Jane's dramatic failure as symbolizing the triumph of
a masculine world. Yet although Jane's personal efforts do not
succeed -- and indeed, finally it is at her own behest that Lassiter
crushes their Mormon pursuers -- simply caring for women profoundly
changes the men. Venters tells Bess, "I'm sure helping you will help
me, for I was sick in mind. There's something now for me to do. And
if I can win back your strength -- then get you away, out of this
wild country -- help you somehow to a happier life -- just think
how good that'll be for me!" (123). He similarly reflects, "How
much better I am for what has come to me!" (192-193).
This altruism appears oddly selfish. Venters is primarily concerned
with "how good" his work for Bess will be for himself, and expects
Bess to get as excited as he in considering the prospect. He thus
offers a masculine version of the selfless nineteenth-century angel
in the house: his work, rather than self-effacing labor for family,
is of value for his own sake. Coincident with this narrative of
domestic initiation into adulthood, moreover, the novel portrays
Venters as "better" through portraying him as increasingly violent.
Before securing himself a home, Venters had willingly given up his
guns to Jane; previous to encountering the rustlers and shooting in
self-defense, he had never killed a man. Once he begins his
homemaking, however, Venters seems to believe it his duty to
embrace bloodshed. In the name of Bess' honor, he goes so far as
to kill Oldring, whom Bess believes to be her father and whom she
tells Venters she loves.6 In classic Slotkin fashion,
Venters is regenerated through violence, but with him violence
plays out as a byproduct of homemaking.
This same confluence of domesticity and violence occurs with Jane
and Lassiter. In the case of this couple, it is Lassiter who remains
relatively unchanged while Jane learns both the necessity of
bloodshed and what constitutes a real home. Urged on by Jane, at the
text's climax Lassiter "roll[s] the rock" that simultaneously
crushes the Mormons whom Jane had been trying to protect, seals
the canyon, and inaugurates Lassiter and Jane's cloistered life
in the home established by Venters. Venters believes that Bess
metaphorically commands his violence; that in order to care for
her properly, he must kill. From Lassiter, Jane literally commands
violence. By doing so, she thereby realizes his long-held dream to
kill those he holds responsible for his sister's death.
Again, this destructive act takes effect outside the domestic
purview: the rock reaches the Mormons "beneath" the valley, thus
preserving the domestic arena from the taint of bloodshed. It is
shown, however, as following directly upon Lassiter's own
involvement in domestic affairs. Prior to this climax, even as
Venters and Bess had been embarking on home life together, so had
Lassiter and Jane. After two lonely decades of tracking, Lassiter
had found himself drawn to Jane's house, lured by the orphan child
Jane was raising: "it was owing to Fay's presence that Jane
Withersteen came to see more of Lassiter. The rider had for the
most part kept to the sage.... Fay, however, captured Lassiter the
moment he first laid eyes on her" (140). Grey goes on to describe
tender family scenes: "In the evening, [Lassiter] played with the
child at an infinite variety of games she invented, and then,
oftener than not, he accepted Jane's invitation to supper....
Lassiter began to show he felt at home there" (144). Lassiter
appears happy and comfortable in this indoor community of women,
composed not only of Fay and Jane but also Fay's dying mother
and Jane's "women," her numerous female servants. Of Lassiter,
Grey states, "He was always at hand to help, and it was [Jane's]
fortune to learn that his boast of being awkward around women had
its root in humility and was not true." Indeed, when it comes to
"women's work," Lassiter is more apt than women themselves: "His
great, brown hands were skilled in a multiplicity of ways which a
woman might have envied. He shared Jane's work, and was of especial
help to her in nursing Mrs. Larkin" (163).
Initially "captured" by this female world, Lassiter increasingly
comes to influence it. In contrast to Lassiter, it is Jane who
lacks traditional female skills. Although she has an apparent
advantage over the rootless Lassiter in having inherited her once
stable family household, Jane has fewer homing instincts than he.
Fay and Lassiter's presence on the ranch makes her realize that "It
had never been a real home" and that her rigid insistence on
cleanliness was misguided. It takes her longer to realize that at
an additional level her home is not homey: although Lassiter
quickly discerned that her servants spied on her, Jane is
incredulous. In comparison to Venters' and Lassiter's dexterity,
Bess is indifferent to homemaking, and Jane simply not good at it.
This is not to say that Jane and Bess are negligible figures on
Grey's domestic canvas. On the contrary, they are crucial in that
they trigger their men into domestic communal life by virtue, it
appears, of their very ineffectuality.
The plot of Riders of the Purple Sage revolves around people
coming together rather than remaining apart. That Grey casts the
Mormon patriarchy as the enemy, a vast social network pitted against
hapless individuals like Venters and Jane, makes for an easy
reading of the text as valorizing individuality over community in
what we may consider to be stereotypical western fashion. But the
text actually does quite the opposite. Lassiter and Venters resist
the Mormon community only to form a tiny new community from five
erstwhile isolates: Venters the "black fox" outcast, Lassiter the
lone gunman, Jane the rebel Mormon daughter, Bess the mysterious
Masked Rider, and Fay the orphan Gentile.
The Riders community of single male-female units, even more
than to white male homosociality, stands in favorable contrast
both to modern Indian society, represented by the lone skulking
Indian male invoked at the text's beginning, and, much more
explicitly, to domineering Mormon society. Like the Mormons',
Lassiter's community is still controlled by men and is still upheld
through violence, but unlike theirs it brings men and women
together. Offering lip-service to "woman's word as law" (10), it
is vastly more heterosexual than the Mormon community, which Grey
represents as subscribing to the ideology of separate spheres. In
the novel, we never actually see a Mormon man and woman together:
the men are always out stirring up trouble, whereas the women are
in the house spying or counseling forbearance. For his Gentile
characters, in contrast, Grey urges gender integration, along the
way exposing Jane's former all-female household as a nest of
deception.
The men need women in order to become men, and the women need men
in order to become women. Through Venters' homesteading, Venters
grows from a boy to a man and Bess from a boy to a woman. Bess'
words show that her transformation has deeper roots than the loss
of her boyish figure and her role as Oldring's Masked Rider: "I've
discovered myself -- too. I'm young -- I'm alive -- I'm so full --
oh! I'm a woman!" (196).7 Making a home with Lassiter,
likewise, marks the end of Jane's feisty girlhood, and Lassiter
himself becomes domesticated. In contrast to the ways in which men
and women need each other, those of the same sex are not
interdependent and, indeed, interact with each other only
minimally. Venters and Lassiter are no tightly bonded "pardners."
Instead, Lassiter is a comfortable father figure to Venters and by
the text's end has taken to calling him son. Similarly, with Jane
as "Uncle Jim's" mate and friend of the girl's mother, Jane and
Bess make a very uncharged aunt and niece duo. In Grey's text,
men and women definitively do not inhabit separate spheres, and
perhaps it is their commingling more than anything else that
signals its divergence from domestic novels. Men take over the
traditional domain of women and their autonomy within it, and in
doing so erode homosocial bonds and privilege heterosexual ones.
Lee Mitchell argues that although their answers vary decade by
decade, the central question westerns ask is "What does it mean
to be a man?" (Westerns 152). Riders of the Purple Sage
suggests that in early westerns, to be a man means to be violent and
a housekeeper -- although not both at the same time.
Grey's text may have offered solace to his male readers, in
presenting an acceptable way to return the house that arguably
one was not expected to take literally, to the extent of bloodshed:
his text suggests that the masculinity of the housekeeping male is
preserved so long as he be rugged, robust, and dexterous enough,
as attuned to the outdoor world as the indoor. That Grey published
many of his early novels in McCall's and Ladies' Home
Journal (including Riders), and in his first decades of
publishing had a largely female readership, thickens the plot
(Mitchell, "White Slaves" 236; Bloodworth 14).8 Rather
than just proffering male readers an alternative mode of masculinity,
was Grey also catering to women's desires by portraying gunfighters
as devoted to the home? Emphasizing the connections as well as the
differences between male western and female domestic writers is one
response to Paul R. Petrie's challenge, that we upset "a
chronologically and gender-divided conception of 19th-century
American literary history by reading male and female, 'realist'
and 'sentimentalist' authors as participants in a unified
literary/cultural field or fields." His comments applying as much
to so-called formula genres as to more canonical realism, Petrie
contends that we need to cross "the 'great divide' in American
literary history."9 To note the convergence of violence,
domesticity, and idealized masculinity in Riders of the Purple
Sage, in which men take over a conventionally female sphere
even as they depend upon women to become real men and to find their
niche in the West, is to make one such crossing. Riders of the
Purple Sage, by suggesting that early westerns rewrite rather
than overturn domestic narratives, invites us to search for these
rewritings not just in the era's westerns, but also in its newly
emerging genres of "realist," "red-blooded," and "hard-boiled"
fiction. How much might such turn-of-the-century developments owe
to nineteenth-century domestic fictionist forebears?
A brief reading of another influential masculinist text may not so
much answer this question as it may suggest the links between
domestic novels, westerns, and other popular genres, as well as
point to the pervasiveness of turn-of-the-century images of the
violent, housekeeping male hero. As a best-selling adventure text
highlighting both the violence and housekeeping of its male
protagonists, Riders of the Purple Sage is complemented by
Edgar Rice Burroughs' Tarzan of the Apes, which was also
first published in 1912. Tarzan's readership and long-term
cultural impact rivals that of Riders, as Bederman's brief
history shows: "Tarzan of the Apes was one of the
best-selling novels of the early-twentieth century. After appearing
in All Story magazine in 1912, it ran serially in at least
eight major metropolitan newspapers. In book form, it was published
in 1914 and sold 750,000 copies by 1934. It spawned twenty-seven
sequels and forty-five movie versions" (Bederman 219). Bederman
argues that the figure of Tarzan, as both Lord Greystoke and King
of the Apes, is a salient illustration of her thesis, that
turn-of-the-century hegemonic ideals of masculinity stemmed from
the notion of white civilized supremacy twinned with primitive
savagery. Possibly inspired by accounts of Theodore Roosevelt's
African safari, Tarzan's links to popular westerns are
manifest in its portrayal of the efforts of an Anglo-Saxon hero
to vanquish his degraded foes as well as contend with a wild
environment.
Tarzan, of course, is set in the African jungle. Yet throughout
almost the length of the text, Burroughs contrasts the jungle to the
one-room cabin in which the white characters, Tarzan excepted, spend
much of their time ensconced in refuge from the lions and apes
outside. The cabin was built by Tarzan's father Clayton after he
and his wife were cast ashore by mutineering seamen. Clayton, "the
type of Englishman that one likes best to associate with the noblest
monuments of historic achievement upon a thousand victorious
battlefields -- a strong, virile man" (2), constructed the house
with care over the length of a month; likewise, Burroughs himself
spends over a page detailing its building in his brief chronicle
of the pair's life in the jungle. Once Clayton finishes the house,
at first his sole occupation is the killing of animals for
self-defense and meat. Eventually, however, a new interest comes
to supplement his shooting:
Long since had he given up any hope of rescue, except through
accident. With unremitting zeal he had worked to beautify the
interior of the cabin. Skins of lion and panther covered the
floor. Cupboards and bookcases lined the walls. Odd vases made
by his own hand from the clay of the region held beautiful
tropical flowers. Curtains of grass and bamboo covered the windows,
and, most arduous task of all, with his meager assortment of tools
he had fashioned lumber to neatly seal the walls and ceiling and
lay a smooth floor within the cabin.That he had been able to turn
his hands at all to such unaccustomed labor was a source of mild
wonder to him. But he loved the work because it was for her and the
tiny life that had come to cheer them. (24)
This description of Clayton's interest in "beautifying" his cabin,
as opposed merely to constructing it, occurs immediately following
the description of his wife's loss of her sanity. Now that is
impossible for his wife to perform a domestic role (not that she
ever was shown performing it, or, indeed, shown doing much of
anything at all), the text can now portray Clayton as taking it
on. Clayton's domestic pursuits, although not acceptable in his
home country of England and startling even to himself, are
sanctioned by his heroic and violent labors outside the home.
Even his penchant for displaying flowers appears manly in the
context of his gathering of native clay for the vases.
Years later, his son Tarzan of the Apes, who exhibits an even
more perfect masculinity, is drawn instinctually to the house
his father built. Tarzan spends hours perusing the books and other
artifacts remaining in it. His desire to spend time there is so
great as to make kingship onerous: "he longed for the little cabin
and the sun-kissed sea -- for the cool interior of the well-built
house, and for the never-ending wonders of the many books.... he
felt that the much preferred the peace and solitude of his cabin
to the irksome duties of leadership amongst a horde of wild beasts"
(91). Yet although Tarzan gives up his role as leader in exchange
for leisure time to spend in the house, the text does not show him
doing anything to or for the house. Unlike his father, Tarzan only
works in, rather than on, the cabin, as he teaches himself to read
and puzzles over the mystery of humankind. He neither prepares food
-- throughout the text Burroughs emphasizes Tarzan's primal
appetite for raw meat straight off the carcass, even when cooked
becomes available -- nor appears to sleep in the cabin. Out in the
jungle, he similarly does no housekeeping. The text includes no
mention of Tarzan constructing a shelter or even a sleeping
pallet for himself; he has less of a camp than had even Bern
Venters, out on the sage.
As with that of Bern and Lassiter, Tarzan's housekeeping is
initiated only by his finding of a female mate. After he battles
with a gorilla for the possession of Jane, Tarzan takes her deep
into the jungle and there prepares a shelter, a bed, and even "with
his knife opened and prepared ... various [ripe and luscious]
fruits for her meal" (164-165). He later repeats this pattern in
caring for the wounded Frenchman D'Arnot. Tarzan's primitive
household labors, along with his father's more sophisticated ones,
appear in the text in implicit contrast to the exclusive pursuits
of black African tribesmen, whose hunting is unsupplemented: "He
noticed that the women alone worked. Nowhere was there any evidence
of a man tilling the fields or performing any of the homely duties
of the village" (74). Tarzan's introduction to white society, and
especially to a white woman, triggers his rapid ascent up the ladder
of civilization.
Yet even prior to this catalyst, Tarzan engages in a single act of
household "work." This act reads like a grim parody of his father's
household labors, which are both vastly more elaborate and more
innocent. Directly after killing the son of a village chieftain,
Tarzan enters the village and, much as he is drawn to his own
father's cabin, is drawn to a village dwelling:
His eyes rested upon the open doorway of a nearby hut. He would
take a look within, thought Tarzan.... There was no sound, and he
glided in to the semi-darkness of the interior.
Weapons hung against the walls -- long spears [sic] strangely
shaped knives, a couple of narrow shields. In the center of the room
was a cooking pot, and at the far end a litter of dry grasses covered
by woven mats which evidently served the owners as beds and bedding.
Several human skulls lay upon the floor. Tarzan of the Apes felt of
each article, hefted the spears, smelled of them.... As he took each
article from the walls, he placed it in a pile in the center of the
room. On top of all he placed the cooking pot, inverted, and on top
of this he laid one of the grinning skulls, upon which he fastened
the headdress of the dead Kulonga. Then he stood back, surveyed his
work, and grinned. Tarzan of the Apes enjoyed a joke. (76)
Tarzan's joking "work" terrorizes the African villagers even more
than does his murder of their prince (77). That Tarzan gravitates
to the hut reveals his civilized inheritances. His housekeeping,
however, takes the form of an act of aggression rather than true
domesticity, and operates independently of women and love. Despite
the fact that their housekeeping and violence feed upon each other,
the men in Grey's Riders maintain the two in separate
spheres. That Tarzan does not here manage to do so shows that
his transition from ape to man is not yet complete: he is not only
a violent housekeeper, but one whose housekeeping is itself violent.
Notes
1 Kimmel quotes General Horace Porter, "The Philosophy of
Courage," Century Illustrated Monthly Magazine 36 (May-Oct
1888): 253.
2 Tompkins persuasively argues that western critics need
to pay more attention to cattle and horses: "Though horses in
Westerns are de rigueur, the characters who ride them don't
pay them much attention, and as far as the critics are concerned
they might as well not exist.... Because of this strange
invisibility they are the place where everything in the genre is
hidden" (90).
3 And, of course, the canyon terrain to which Grey
devotes so much narrative energy itself could be read as an
eroticized feminine landscape.
4 For a discussion of the uses to which Grey and his
contemporaries put such communities, see Walter Benn Michaels'
"The Vanishing American," which takes its title from one of Grey's
novels.
5 By way of contrast, consider Willa Cather's
contemporaneous Song of the Lark (1915). Her heroine Thea
experiences the same awe as Venters in encountering traces of a
history reaching far past that of Euro-America. In Thea's case,
however, living in the cliff dwellers' caves leads not to renewed
appreciation of community and relationships, but to greater
command of her own art and genius.
6 In one of the most disconcerting moments of the text,
Venters becomes enraged with Jane for inadvertently informing Bess
of this murder and thereby putting a strain on their relationship.
7 Regarding Bess' literal transformation: "she no longer
resembled a boy. No eye could have failed to mark the rounded
contours of a woman" (175).
8 Bloodworth seeks to account for the seeming incongruity
of westerns published in ladies' magazines by suggesting that in
contrast to our beliefs the readers were "actually post-Victorian
in sentiment" (14). It may be more fruitful to speculate that it is
our perception of the books along with the readers that bears
reevaluation.
9 Paul R. Petrie, Call For Papers: "Across the Great
Divide: Bridging the Gender Gap in Nineteenth-Century U.S.
Literary History," Northeast MLA, Pittsburgh, April 16-17, 1999.
September 4, 1998.
Works Cited
Allmendinger, Blake. Ten Most Wanted: The New Western
Literature. New York: Routledge, 1998.
Bederman, Gail. Manliness and Civilization: A Cultural History of
Gender and Race in the United States, 1880-1917. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, 1995.
Blaha, Franz. "Zane Grey." Westbrook, Updating the Literary
West. 949-54.
Bloodworth, William. "Zane Grey's Western Eroticism." South
Dakota Review 23.3 (Autumn 1985): 5-14.
Burroughs, Edgar Rice. Tarzan of the Apes. 1914. Reprint.
New York: Buccaneer Books, n.d.
Campbell, SueEllen. "Connecting the Country: What's New in Western
Literary Criticism?" Westbrook, Updating the Literary West. 3-16.
Cather, Willa. The Song of the Lark. Houghton Mifflin Co., 1915.
Cawelti, John G. "The Six-Gun Mystique: Twenty-Five Years After."
Westbrook, Updating the Literary West. 883-87.
Comer, Krista. "Feminism, Women Writers and the New Western
Regionalism: Revising Critical Paradigms." Westbrook, Updating
the Literary West. 17-34.
Grey, Zane. Riders of the Purple Sage. New York: Grosset &
Dunlap, 1912.
Harte, Bret. The Luck of Roaring Camp and Selected Stories and
Poems. 1870. Reprint. New York: MacMillan, 1928.
Kimball, Arthur G. Ace of Hearts: The Westerns of Zane Grey.
Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press, 1993.
Kimmel, Michael. Manhood in America: A Cultural History. New
York: Free Press, 1996.
Kolodny, Annette. The Land Before Her: Fantasy and Experience of
the American Frontiers, 1630-1860. Chapel Hill: University of
North Carolina Press, 1984.
Limerick, Patricia Nelson. The Legacy of Conquest: The Unbroken
Past of the American West. W.W. Norton, 1987.
Martin, Russell and Mark Barasch, eds. Writers of the Purple
Sage: An Anthology of Recent Western Writing. New York: Viking,
1984.
Michaels, Walter Benn. "The Vanishing American." American
Literary History 2.2 (1990): 220-41.
Mitchell, Lee. Westerns: Making the Man in Fiction and Film.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
---. "White Slaves and Purple Sage: Plotting Sex in Zane Grey's
West." American Literary History 6.2 (1994): 234-64.
Petrie, Paul R. Northeast MLA Call For Papers: "Across the Great
Divide: Bridging the Gender Gap in Nineteenth-Century U.S. Literary
History." Sept. 4, 1998.
Slotkin, Richard. Gunfighter Nation: The Myth of the Frontier in
Twentieth-Century America. New York: Atheneum, 1992.
Tompkins, Jane. West of Everything: The Inner Life of
Westerns. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
Westbrook, Max. Preface. Updating the Literary West. Fort
Worth: Texas Christian University Press, 1997.
Cathryn Halverson is an assistant professor of American literature
at Kobe City University of Foreign Studies. She has published
articles on autobiography, travel literature, and western literature,
and is completing a book on western women's autobiographies titled
Maverick Autobiographies and the American West, 1902-1936: Mary
MacLane, Opal Whiteley, Juanita Harrison.
|