Download the PDF
version of this article if you wish to view it or print it out
with the same formatting as appears in the print version of the
Rocky Mountain Review.
(Requires Adobe Acobat
Reader.)
Jack Selzer and Sharon Crowley, eds. Rhetorical Bodies.
Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1999. 406p.
Brad E. Lucas
University of Nevada, Reno
The sixteen essays comprising Rhetorical Bodies emerged from
the Fifteenth Penn State Conference on Rhetoric and Composition in
1997. Editors Jack Selzer and Sharon Crowley have furthered this
collection beyond any mere conference proceedings: the essays read
like fully developed articles on the material conditions,
embodiments, and technologies of rhetoric. According to Selzer, "the
contributors together consider what it might mean to take very
seriously the material conditions that sustain the production,
circulation, and consumption of rhetorical power (whether that
power is in a text or some other physical form)" (9-10). From the
assessment of shifting political ideologies in Washington, DC, to
the study of home HIV testing kits, Rhetorical Bodies
illustrates the material dimensions of traditional literary
practices while advocating new ways of thinking about literacy,
embodiment, and rhetorical dynamics for the next century and beyond.
Readers will find careful investigations of unlikely sites,
combining academic concerns with popular sensibilities. Contemporary
subjects include U.S. memorial sites, Vanity Fair's cover
nude of a pregnant Demi Moore, and Elizabeth Taylor's public
"bearding" for Malcolm Forbes as a means to disguise his
homosexuality. Other subjects delve historically into the
boundaries of corporeal life, such as Susan Wells' recovery of
dissection narratives from nineteenth-century women physicians,
and Christine DeVinne's return to the notorious cannibalism of
the ill-fated Donner Party. More traditional studies of rural
literacy, working class student poetry, and archival deterioration
are perhaps less provocative, but nonetheless breath new life into
the complex relationships between textual artifacts and physical
bodies, suggesting that these rhetorics of materiality apply equally
to traditional as well as cultural notions of text.
Particularly intriguing in this collection are the corporeal
implications of science and politics, prompting complex inquiry
handled with analytic precision. For example, John Schilb explores
the impact of psychotropic drugs on autobiography, and Christina
Haas considers how the notion of space is created, defined, and
regulated at abortion clinics. The most useful contributions to
Rhetorical Bodies, however, are essays that stand to
challenge our future thinking about materiality and rhetoric.
Lester Faigley challenges notions of literacy that denigrate
the visual, and Yameng Liu questions how the shifting ideologies
of Dick Morris (and Bill Clinton) reflects a disruption of the
connections between political loyalty and the work of rhetoricians.
As a striking coda to this collection, Celeste Condit offers an
incisive critique of ultra-structuralist theory for its neglect of
materiality, offering the coding of DNA as a model for future
consideration of material rhetorics.
The contributions to Rhetorical Bodies are well-researched,
accessible, and theoretically stimulating in their treatment of
materiality. Many contributors attend to the intricate details of
their studies, offering extensive analyses of their material
subjects with pithy theoretical reflections that circulate
throughout the book. However, while the individual essays comprise
a coherent whole, some of them could have been much more concise.
Several essays belabor the analyses, burying readers in excessive
details without counterbalancing commentary -- raising tacit
questions about the precarious tension between matter and meaning.
Even more stunning, however, is the ironic absence of the writers
in Rhetorical Bodies. There are some clues that these
noteworthy scholars occupy a place in the worlds they study
(especially Wendy Sharer's research on the preservation of research
materials), but by and large, the presence of the researcher is
elided in these essays, giving us the sense that some of these
rhetorical bodies are indeed haunted by ghosts. Despite its few
shortcomings, Rhetorical Bodies will likely provoke readers
to think, ultimately making this collection a welcome contribution
to consider how our lives are steeped in rhetoric and the material
world.
|